吃入—剪切复合破岩模式下PDC齿的破岩规律与损伤特性研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2096-1693.2026.02.017

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

PDC齿的破岩效率与耐用性是影响钻井提速提效的关键因素。现有PDC齿破岩研究主要在恒定吃入深度下开展，对PDC齿吃入地层时吃入—剪切复合破岩规律及其剪切断裂特性认识不足。本文基于立式转塔车床，设计了PDC齿吃入—剪切复合破岩实验，探究了岩性、吃入深度、后倾角与齿形特征等因素对PDC齿破岩效果的影响规律，并引入皮尔逊相关系数方法，对各影响因素与破岩效率之间的相关性进行了定量表征，此外在30°和35°大后倾角下开展了PDC齿抗剪切断裂测试。结果表明，在吃入—剪切复合破岩模式下，岩性是影响PDC齿破岩效率的首要因素，切削花岗岩时切削力与机械比能均显著高于砂岩；吃入深度是影响破岩效率的关键变量，随着吃入深度增加，机械比能快速下降并逐渐趋于稳定，而攻击性则单调增大且与岩性无关；异形齿破岩所需能量较低、破岩效率较高，具有更强的抗剪切断裂能力，但齿形特征及后倾角与破岩效率的相关性弱于岩性和吃入深度。在大后倾角(≥30°)下，PDC齿的破岩方式逐渐由剪切转向压碎破岩，同时岩屑难以排出、切削力增大且周期性动态冲击增强，易导致PDC齿剪切断裂失效，合理选择后倾角和控制吃入深度是防止PDC齿过早失效的有效措施。研究成果可为PDC齿设计优化和现场应用提供参考。

关键词: 吃入—剪切复合破岩, PDC齿, 齿形结构, 机械比能, 深层/超深层钻井

Abstract:

The rock-breaking efficiency and durability of PDC cutters are critical to improving the rate of penetration and drilling efficiency. Previous studies on PDC cutter rock breaking have mainly been conducted at a constant depth of cut, and the penetration-shearing hybrid rock-breaking behavior and associated shear fracture characteristics during cutter penetration into the formation remain insufficiently investigated. In this work, a penetration-shearing hybrid rock-breaking experiment was developed on a vertical turret lathe to investigate the effects of lithology, depth of cut, back rake angle, and cutter geometry on the rock-breaking performance of PDC cutters. Pearson correlation analysis was further introduced to quantitatively characterize the correlations between the influencing factors and rock-breaking efficiency, and shearing fracture tests were also conducted at back rake angles of 30° and 35°. During penetration-shearing hybrid rock-breaking, lithology was the primary factor controlling the rock-breaking efficiency of PDC cutters, with both the cutting forces and mechanical specific energy during granite cutting being significantly higher than those during sandstone cutting. Depth of cut was another key variable affecting rock-breaking efficiency. As the depth of cut increased, the mechanical specific energy decreased rapidly and gradually approached a stable value, whereas aggressiveness increased monotonically and remained independent of lithology. Shaped cutters required less energy for rock breaking, exhibited higher rock-breaking efficiency, and showed stronger resistance to shear fracture. However, the correlations of cutter geometry and back rake angle with rock-breaking efficiency were weaker than those of lithology and depth of cut. At back rake angles of 30° or higher, the rock-breaking mode gradually shifted from shearing to crushing. Meanwhile, cuttings became more difficult to remove, the cutting forces increased, and periodic dynamic impacts intensified, which readily induced shear-fracture failure of the PDC cutter. And rational selection of the back rake angle and proper control of the depth of cut were effective measures for preventing premature failure of PDC cutters. These findings provided theoretical guidance for the design optimization and field application of PDC cutters.

Key words: penetration-shearing hybrid rock-breaking, PDC cutter, cutter shape, mechanical specific energy, deep/ultra-deep drilling

中图分类号:

TE21
TE921

冯超超, 刘维, 高德利, 章宇. 吃入—剪切复合破岩模式下PDC齿的破岩规律与损伤特性研究[J]. 石油科学通报, 2026, 11(2): 487-503.

FENG Chaochao, LIU Wei, GAO Deli, ZHANG Yu. Study on the rock-breaking behavior and fracture characteristics of PDC cutters in penetration-shearing hybrid rock-breaking[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2026, 11(2): 487-503.

https://sykxtb.cup.edu.cn/CN/Y2026/V11/I2/487

图/表 20

图1 立式转塔车床实验装置

Fig. 1 Vertical turret lathe testing system

表1 破岩效率实验所用PDC齿

Table 1 PDC cutters used in the rock-breaking efficiency tests

序号	齿形	直径/mm	高度/mm	倒角/mm	是否抛光
1	圆形齿	16	13	0.4	否
2	圆形齿	16	13	0.2	否
3	抛光圆形齿	16	13	0.4	是
4	165斧形齿	16	13	0.4	否
5	135斧形齿	16	13	0.4	否

表2 耐用性实验所用PDC齿

Table 2 PDC cutters used in the durability tests

序号	齿形	直径/mm	高度/mm	金刚石层材质	金刚石层厚/mm	倒角/mm	是否抛光
1	圆形齿	16	13	#A/#B/#C	3	0.4	否
2	抛光圆形齿	16	13	#B	3	0.4	是
3	165斧形齿	16	13	#A/#B	3	0.4	否
4	3D齿	16	13	#A	3	0.4	否
5	150奔驰齿	16	13	#A	3	0.4	否
6	160奔驰齿	16	13	#A	3	0.4	否

图2 实验用PDC齿

Fig. 2 Various PDC cutters used in this work

图3 吃入—剪切复合破岩实验

Fig. 3 Penetration-shearing hybrid rock-breaking experiment

图4 (a)目标吃入深度为4 mm时，切削花岗岩与砂岩时的切削力对比；(b)目标吃入深度和岩性对岩屑质量的影响；(c)目标吃入深度对破岩所需能量和机械比能的影响；(d)吃入不同阶段的机械比能对比

Fig. 4 (a) Comparison of cutting forces between cutting granite and sandstone at a target depth of cut of 4 mm; (b) Effects of target depth of cut and lithology on cuttings mass; (c) Effects of target depth of cut on rock-breaking energy and mechanical specific energy; (d) Comparison of mechanical specific energy at different penetration stages

图5 倒角尺寸对(a)切向力和(b)轴向力的影响

Fig. 5 Effects of chamfer size on (a) tangential force and (b) axial force

图6 倒角尺寸对(a)攻击性和(b)机械比能的影响

Fig. 6 Effects of chamfer size on (a) cutter aggressiveness and (b) mechanical specific energy

图7 抛光处理对(a)切向力和(b)轴向力的影响

Fig. 7 Effects of polishing on (a) tangential force and (b) axial force

图8 抛光处理对(a)攻击性和(b)机械比能的影响

Fig. 8 Effects of polishing on (a) cutter aggressiveness and (b) mechanical specific energy

图9 切削花岗岩时，后倾角对(a)切向力和(b)轴向力的影响；切削砂岩时，后倾角对(c)切向力和(d)轴向力的影响

Fig. 9 Effects of back rake angle on (a) tangential force and (b) axial force when cutting granite, and on (c) tangential force and (d) axial force when cutting sandstone

图10 切削(a)花岗岩和(b)砂岩时，后倾角对攻击性的影响

Fig. 10 Effects of back rake angle on cutter aggressiveness when cutting (a) granite and (b) sandstone

图11 不同后倾角下，齿形对(a，c)切向力和(b，d)轴向力的影响

Fig. 11 Effects of cutter shape on (a, c) tangential force and (b, d) axial force under different back rake angles

图12 吃入深度和后倾角对(a)135斧形齿和(b)165斧形齿攻击性的影响

Fig. 12 Effects of depth of cut and back rake angle on the aggressiveness of (a) the 135 axe-shaped cutter and (b) the 165 axe-shaped cutter

图13 岩性、齿形和后倾角对机械比能的影响

Fig. 13 Effects of lithology, cutter shape and back rake angle on mechanical specific energy

图14 影响因素与机械比能之间的皮尔逊相关性矩阵

Fig. 14 Pearson correlation matrix between influencing factors and mechanical specific energy

表3 PDC齿耐用性测试结果

Table 3 Fracture test results of PDC cutters

序号	齿形	材质	后倾角		备注
序号	齿形	材质	30°	35°	备注
1	圆形齿	#A	部分损伤	断裂	材质比较
2		#B	完好	断裂
3		#C	完好	完好
4	抛光圆形齿	#B	完好	完好	抛光比较
5	165斧形齿	#A	完好	断裂	齿形比较
6	165斧形齿	#B	完好	断裂
7	160奔驰齿	#A	完好	完好
8	150奔驰齿	#A	完好	完好
9	3D齿	#A	完好	完好

图15 PDC齿断裂损伤形貌

Fig. 15 Fracture morphology of PDC cutters

图16 PDC齿从裂纹出现到完全断裂的损伤失效演化过程

Fig. 16 Failure evolution of a PDC cutter from crack initiation to complete fracture

图17 现场应用后钻头PDC齿断裂失效

Fig. 17 Fractured PDC cutters on the bit after field application

参考文献 38

[1]	杨海军, 王春生, 杨宪彰, 等. 深地塔科1井万米特深井钻探关键技术进展与科学意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2025, 52(5): 1180-1188. doi: 10.11698/PED.20250259
	[YANG H J, WANG C S, YANG X Z, et al. Technological progress and scientific significance of the drilling of the ten-thousand-meter ultra-deep well TK1, Tarim Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2025, 52(5): 1180-1188.]
[2]	高德利, 李宁, 黄文君, 等. 超深井套管柱力学与控制研究若干进展及展望[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 50(1): 84-98.
	[GAO D L, LI N, HUANG W J, et al. Research advances and prospects on casing mechanics and control in ultra-deep oil and gas well engineering[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2026, 50(1): 84-98.]
[3]	刘维, 高德利, 未九森, 等. 钻头破岩效率与对应提速策略研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2026: 1-31.
	[LIU W, GAO D L, WEI J S, et al. Study on rock-breaking efficiency of PDC bits and the corresponding ROP improvement strategies[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2026: 1-31.]
[4]	高德利, 刘维, 万绪新, 等. PDC钻头钻井提速关键影响因素研究[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2023, 51(4): 20-34.
	[GAO D L, LIU W, WAN X X, et al. Study on key factors influencing the ROP improvement of PDC bits[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2023, 51(4): 20-34.]
[5]	刘维, 高德利. PDC钻头研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 前瞻科技, 2023, 2(2): 168-178. doi: 10.3981/j.issn.2097-0781.2023.02.013
	[LIU W, GAO D L. Research status and development trends of polycrystalline diamond compact bits[J]. Science and Technology Foresight, 2023, 2(2): 168-178.] doi: 10.3981/j.issn.2097-0781.2023.02.013
[6]	未九森, 韩欣, 刘维, 等. PDC钻头切削齿回转破岩侧向力产生机制[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2026: 1-9.
	[WEI J S, HAN X, LIU W, et al. Mechanism of Lateral Force Generation in Rotary Rock-Breaking with a Single PDC Cutter[J]. Coal Geology & Exploration, 2026: 1-9.]
[7]	李根生, 武晓光, 宋先知, 等. 干热岩地热资源开采技术现状与挑战[J]. 石油科学通报, 2022, 7(3): 343-364.
	[LI G S, WU X G, SONG X Z, et al. Status and challenges of hot dry rock geothermal resource exploitation[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2022, 7(3): 343-364.]
[8]	罗鸣, 冯永存, 桂云, 等. 高温高压钻井关键技术发展现状及展望[J]. 石油科学通报, 2021, 6(2): 228-244.
	[LUO M, FENG Y C, GUI Y, et al. Development status and prospect of key technologies for high temperature and high pressure drilling[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2021, 6(2): 228-244.]
[9]	彭建新, 邱金平, 才博, 等. 塔里木超深油气储层改造技术进展[J]. 石油科学通报, 2025, 10(4): 695-708.
	[PENG J X, QIU J P, CAI B, et al. Technical progress of ultra-deep oil and gas reservoir stimulation in Tarim Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2025, 10(4): 695-708.]
[10]	蔡明杰, 罗鑫, 陈力力, 等. 万米深井SDCK1井超大尺寸井眼钻井技术[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2024, 52(2): 87-92.
	[CAI M J, LUO X, CHEN L L, et al. Ultra-large borehole drilling technologies of 10 000-meter deep well SDCK1[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2024, 52(2): 87-92.]
[11]	宋东东, 罗鑫, 何明敏. 万米特深井Ø812.8 mm PDC钻头研制及现场应用[J]. 石油机械, 2025, 53(2): 31-36.
	[SONG D D, LUO X, HE M M. Development and Application of Ø812.8 mm PDC Bit for Myriameter Ultradeep Wells[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2025, 53(2): 31-36.]
[12]	祝效华, 阳飞龙, 刘伟吉. 液柱压力下PDC齿切削破岩机理[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(10): 1943-1959. doi: 10.7623/syxb202510009
	[ZHU X H, YANG F L, LIU W J. Rock-breaking mechanism of PDC cutter under hydrostatic pressures[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2025, 46(10): 1943-1959.] doi: 10.7623/syxb202510009
[13]	吴泽兵, 袁若飞, 张文溪, 等. 圆弧锯形仿生PDC齿的破岩机理及钻头钻进分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2024, 24(24): 10280-10286.
	[WU Z B, YUAN R F, ZHANG W X, et al. Rock breaking mechanism and bit drilling analysis of circular arc saw bionic PDC cutter[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2024, 24(24): 10280-10286.]
[14]	未九森, 邵方源, 谭紫阳, 等. PDC切削齿直径对切削力的影响规律研究[J]. 石油机械, 2023, 51(4): 8-15.
	[WEI J S, SHAO F Y, TAN Z Y, et al. Influence of PDC cutter diameter on cutting force[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2023, 51(4): 8-15.]
[15]	孙源秀, 邹德永, 徐城凯, 等. 锥形聚晶金刚石复合片钻头(PDC)齿与常规PDC齿破岩效果对比试验[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2015, 15(36): 159-162.
	[SUN Y X, ZOU D Y, XU C K, et al. Contrast experiment on conical PDC cutter and conventional PDC cutter[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15(36): 159-162.]
[16]	杨迎新, 胡浩然, 黄奎林, 等. 环脊式PDC钻头破岩机理实验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(5): 1451-1460.
	[YANG Y X, HU H R, HUANG K L, et al. Experimental research on the rock-breaking mechanism of annular-ridge PDC bit[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2019, 15(5): 1451-1460.]
[17]	程镇. PDC钻头齿周岩石裂纹演化特征与机理研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2021.
	[CHENG Z. Research on the cracks evolution characteristic and mechanism around PDC bits[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2021.]
[18]	熊超. 锥形PDC齿破碎花岗岩机理研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2022.
	[XIONG C. Study on mechanism of conical diamond element breaking granite[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2022.]
[19]	SHAO F Y, LIU W, GAO D L, et al. Study on rock-breaking mechanism of axe-shaped PDC cutter[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 205: 108922. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108922 URL
[20]	WEI J S, LIU W, GAO D L. Modeling of PDC bit-rock interaction behaviors based on the analysis of dynamic rock-cutting process[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2024, 239: 212955. doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2024.212955 URL
[21]	LIU W, WANG Y C, WANG X Y, et al. Rock-breaking mechanism and performance of arch-ridged cutters used for PDC bits[J]. SPE Journal, 2025, 30(4): 1708-1722. doi: 10.2118/224427-PA URL
[22]	姜鑫, 邹德永, 王家骏, 等. PDC切削齿冲击载荷预测模型的试验研究[J]. 石油机械, 2014, 42(4): 1-3, 15.
	[JIANG X, ZOU D Y, WANG J J, et al. Experimental study of the prediction model for impact load on PDC cutters[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2014, 42(4): 1-3, 15.]
[23]	邹德永, 王瑞和. PDC钻头的岩石研磨性试验研究[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 27(2): 41-43.
	[ZOU D Y, WANG R H. Experimental study on rock abrasiveness with PDC bit[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China (Edition of Natural Science), 2003, 27(2): 41-43.]
[24]	赵东鹏, 马姗姗, 牛同健, 等. 硬质岩层钻探用曲面聚晶金刚石复合片的性能表征[J]. 金刚石与磨料磨具工程, 2016, 36(6): 83-86.
	[ZHAO D P, MA S S, NIU T J, et al. Characterization of polycrystalline diamond compact with non-planar surfaces for drilling hard-formation[J]. Diamond & Abrasives Engineering, 2016, 36(6): 83-86.]
[25]	赵东鹏, 耿菖健, 方海江. 聚晶金刚石复合片界面微观结构对性能的影响[J]. 金刚石与磨料磨具工程, 2022, 42(1): 76-80.
	[ZHAO D P, GENG C J, FANG H J. Effect of interface microstructure on properties of polycrystalline diamond composites[J]. Diamond & Abrasives Engineering, 2022, 42(1): 76-80.]
[26]	栾治星, 王德亮, 李成军, 等. 金属含量对PDC齿微观结构及机械性能的影响[J]. 金刚石与磨料磨具工程, 2025: 1-10.
	[LUAN Z X, WANG D L, LI C J, et al. Effect of metal content on microstructure and mechanical properties of PDC cutter[J]. Diamond & Abrasives Engineering, 2025: 1-10.]
[27]	李波, 何志波, 梁春平, 等. 基于正交切削理论的PDC钻头切削齿动态破岩温度分布[J]. 中国矿业, 2024, 33(4): 171-181.
	[LI B, HE Z B, LIANG C P, et al. Dynamic rock-breaking temperature distribution of PDC bit cutter based on orthogonal cutting theory[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2024, 33(4): 171-181.]
[28]	刘江涛, 邹灵战, 李忠明, 等. 页岩油气钻机装备配套能力提升研究与认识[J]. 石油机械, 2023, 51(12): 38-43.
	[LIU J T, ZOU L Z, LI Z M, et al. Improvement of rig equipment capability for shale oil/gas well drilling[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2023, 51(12): 38-43.]
[29]	汪海阁, 常龙, 卓鲁斌, 等. 中国石油陆相页岩油钻井技术现状与发展建议[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2024, 20(3): 1-14.
	[WANG H G, CHANG L, ZHUO L B, et al. Current status and suggestions for drilling technology of CNPC continental shale oil reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2024, 20(3): 1-14.]
[30]	田启忠, 戴荣东, 王继强, 等. 胜利油田页岩油丛式井提速提效钻井技术[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2023, 45(4): 404-409.
	[TIAN Q Z, DAI R D, WANG J Q, et al. An efficient and fast shale oil cluster well drilling technology for Shengli Oilfield[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 45(4): 404-409.]
[31]	刘维, 高德利, 李越, 等. PDC齿主要失效形式与钻头选型方法研究[J]. 金刚石与磨料磨具工程, 2026: 1-50.
	[LIU W, GAO D L, LI Y, et al. Study on main failure modes of PDC cutters and bit selection methods[J]. Diamond & Abrasives Engineering, 2026: 1-50.]
[32]	赵国浩, 熊浪豪, 陈君, 等. 西土孜库区块白垩系复杂岩性个性化高效破岩PDC钻头的优选与应用[J]. 钻采工艺, 2023, 46(4): 157-161.
	[ZHAO G H, XIONG L H, CHEN J, et al. Selection and application of efficient rock breaking PDC bits for complex lithology of Cretaceous in WT block[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 46(4): 157-161.]
[33]	WEI J S, LIU W, GAO D L. Effect of cutter shape on the resistance of PDC cutters against tip impacts[J]. SPE Journal, 2022, 27(5): 3035-3050. doi: 10.2118/209809-PA URL
[34]	SHAO F Y, JI G D, LIU L, et al. Analysis of failure modes and impact resistance factors of PDC cutters[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2025, 244: 213462. doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213462 URL
[35]	商春磊, 王传军, 刘文月, 等. 数据驱动的文献辅助管线钢产线落锤撕裂韧性内禀特征关联[J]. 工程科学学报, 2023, 45(8): 1390-1399.
	[SHANG C L, WANG C J, LIU W Y, et al. Prediction of the drop hammer-derived tear toughness of pipeline steel production lines using literature data and production line data[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2023, 45(8): 1390-1399.]
[36]	刘维, 高德利. 大齿快切PDC钻头提速研究与现场试验[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(9): 102-110.
	[LIU W, GAO D L. Research and field test of large-tooth and rapid-cutting PDC bit for ROP enhancement[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(9): 102-110.]
[37]	LIU W, WEI J S, GE Y B, et al. New prediction method for ROP potential of shaped PDC cutters[J]. SPE Journal, 2025, 30(4): 1670-1679. doi: 10.2118/223969-PA URL
[38]	RAJABOV V, MISKA S, MORTIMER L, et al. The effects of back rake and side rake angles on mechanical specific energy of single PDC cutters with selected rocks at varying depth of cuts and confining pressures[C]// IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition, San Diego, California, USA, 2012: SPE-151406-MS.

选择文件类型/文献管理软件名称

选择包含的内容